Visualization or networking for a job hunt? Networking finds the jobs; visualization gets you to send the message

The short verdict

Picturing a job does not tell any employer that you exist. A contact can. The two are not competitors: one is a way to reach openings and the people who fill them, the other is a way to prepare your own behaviour. The mistake is to use visualization instead of networking, picturing the offer at night and sending no message in the morning. Used before networking, as rehearsal, it can help you do the part you would otherwise put off.

What the weak-ties study found

In 1973 the sociologist Mark Granovetter published “The Strength of Weak Ties” in the American Journal of Sociology, drawing on his survey of professional, technical and managerial workers who had recently changed jobs in a Boston suburb. Of those who found their job through a personal contact (N = 54 in his interview subsample), 16.7 % saw that contact often at the time (at least twice a week), 55.6 % occasionally and 27.8 % rarely (once a year or less). Our calculation: 55.6 + 27.8 = 83.4 % found the job through someone they saw less than twice a week.

Weak ties, in his sense, are people you are not close to and see rarely. Granovetter’s explanation is structural: close friends move in the same circles as you and know what you already know, while acquaintances reach other circles and hear of other openings. In his words, the contact was often “someone only marginally included in the current network of contacts, such as an old college friend or a former workmate or employer.” The sample is small, from one suburb, and long before the internet, which is why the next study matters.

What a 2022 experiment on LinkedIn found

In 2022, Karthik Rajkumar and colleagues at LinkedIn, Harvard, Stanford and MIT published in Science a large causal test of the idea. LinkedIn’s “People You May Know” feature had run randomised experiments that changed how many weak ties members were offered, across more than 20 million people over five years, during which 2 billion new ties and 600,000 new jobs were created.

Weak ties did increase job mobility, with three refinements. The effect was an inverted U: weaker ties helped up to a point, after which even weaker ties helped less. Moderately weak ties, measured by mutual connections, and the weakest ties, measured by how rarely people interact, created the most job mobility. And the effect depended on the industry: weak ties helped more in digital industries, while strong ties helped more in less digital ones. The practical reading: the best person to message is often someone you know a little, with a few people in common, not a stranger and not your closest friend.

How employers actually hire

The employer side tells the same story. In the French survey of hiring practices (Dares, Ofer 2016, relayed by Insee; private-sector hires on contracts of a month or more in autumn 2015), employers used online job ads or CV databases in about half of their hires, but credited the internet with finding the person finally hired in only 21 % of cases. Personal or professional relations were used in 52 % of hires, and spontaneous applications were examined in 68 %.

In the US, a study of every applicant to one financial services company found that referred applicants were 6 % of the pool and 29 % of the hires; the guide “How to get job offers in a competitive job market” covers those numbers. Neither study says job boards are useless. They say a search run only through public postings ignores the channels that fill a large share of jobs.

What visualization does, and what it does not

Picturing the outcome can work against you. In Gabriele Oettingen and Doris Mayer’s 2002 study of 83 graduating students in Munich, those who reported more positive fantasies about getting a job sent fewer applications and, two years later (40 of the 83 could be reached), had received fewer offers; confident expectations predicted the opposite. A scene of the offer feels like progress and asks for nothing.

Picturing the process is different. Rehearsing your own steps, the message you will write, the first sentence of the call, is the kind of mental simulation that research has linked to doing the task; the guide “Visualizing work and career moments that feel real” covers the process-versus-outcome studies. That is the only honest place for visualization in a job hunt: as a rehearsal of the networking step, not a replacement for it.

Why networking feels hard, and how to make it easier

Many people find networking unpleasant, and research has measured why. In four studies published in 2014, Tiziana Casciaro, Francesca Gino and Maryam Kouchaki found that networking to advance a professional goal can make people feel morally “dirty”; in a law firm, lawyers who felt this way networked less often and had lower job performance. The article carries a 2024 correction after a data review of studies involving co-author Francesca Gino; the law-firm study was reproduced. Our own suggestion, not something the studies tested: go in with something to offer, a question you are curious about, an article, help with something small, rather than only a request.

The other fix is rehearsal. A message you have already written in your head is easier to send. The guide “Rehearsing a conversation you care about” shows how to rehearse a hard talk at night; for networking, the scene is short: you open the chat, you write two sentences, you press send.

A weekly plan that uses both

Each evening, in the 2-minute night ritual, picture tomorrow’s networking step from your own eyes: the name, the opening line, the moment you press send. In Dream Architect, “Write my own moment” takes a few words in the present tense, and at One small step, near the end of the full ritual, the choice “Write one bold line” is your cue to write on paper the name of the person you will contact. In the day, send that message. Across the week, aim for a small, steady number, for example three messages to people you know a little and one follow-up, rather than a burst once a month.

Keep a simple list of who you contacted, when, and what came back, so that follow-ups do not depend on memory. None of this promises a job, and a referral cannot make up for a poor fit with the role. It moves your effort to the channel that the evidence points to, and gives your evening practice a job it can actually do.

Questions people ask next